Kiri Docker Desktop alternative
Free · Apache 2.0 Mac, Windows and Linux
The Docker Desktop alternative that's eight times quicker to start a container.
Kiri runs the containers you run today with the docker commands you already type. It is free at work, open source, and on a Mac it starts a container in 22 ms where Docker Desktop takes 178 ms.
In beta, signed and notarized on the Mac. Install it next to Docker Desktop and switch with docker context use kiri.
Measured
Eight times quicker than Docker Desktop.
Four engines on one Apple silicon Mac, each limited to the same 2 CPUs and 8 GB, driven by the same docker CLI with the same warm images. Medians, lower is better for times.
| Measurement | Kiri | Docker Desktop | OrbStack | Colima |
|---|---|---|---|---|
docker run --rm alpine true | 22 ms | 178 ms | 279 ms | 152 ms |
docker exec … true | 15.7 ms | 47.7 ms | 32.5 ms | 36.8 ms |
| Container lifecycle through the Docker API | 3.1 ms | 163 ms | 238 ms | 88 ms |
| Containers started in parallel | 88.9 /s | 11.4 /s | 8.2 /s | 12.9 /s |
| 200 MB out of a container | 223 MB/s | 45 MB/s | 87 MB/s | 63 MB/s |
| Bind mount read, 1 GB | 1724 MB/s | 1354 MB/s | 3240 MB/s | 5235 MB/s |
2 November 2026, Kiri 0.1.13, Docker Desktop 4.90.0, OrbStack 2.2.4, Colima 0.10.3. Where another engine wins, the table says so: Colima reads bind mounts faster. On Windows Kiri starts a container in 78 ms against Docker Desktop's 491 ms. Method, every row and the caveats: benchmarks.
Side by side
Kiri, Docker Desktop, OrbStack and Colima.
| Feature | Kiri | Docker Desktop | OrbStack | Colima |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Linux | Yes, no VM | In a VM | No | Yes |
| Free at work | Yes | Paid over 250 staff | Paid | Yes |
| Open source | Apache 2.0 | No | No | MIT |
| Desktop app | Native | Electron | Native | CLI only |
docker, Compose, buildx | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Kubernetes | Yes | Yes | Yes | k3s |
| Public link to a container | Kiri Share | No | No | No |
docker run on a Mac | 22 ms | 178 ms | 279 ms | 152 ms |
Docker Desktop needs a paid subscription in companies with more than 250 employees or more than $10 million a year in revenue. OrbStack is free for personal use and paid for work. Checked November 2026; each project's own pages have the current terms.
Why switch
Everything you open Docker Desktop for.
Same commands
docker run, docker compose up, docker buildx build and the Docker Engine API, so your scripts, Makefiles, IDE and Testcontainers keep working.
No licence to buy
Kiri is free for any company of any size, under Apache 2.0. Nothing to count, nothing to renew.
One engine, three systems
The same Rust daemon on Mac, Windows and Linux. On Linux there is no VM at all: containers run straight on your kernel.
A native window
AppKit on the Mac, Win32 and WebView2 on Windows. No Electron. Containers, images, volumes, networks and Compose, with logs and a terminal.
Kubernetes when you want it
kiri k8s start gives you a single-node cluster in about 20 seconds, and stops when you stop it.
Light when idle
The VM gives unused memory back and sleeps after a minute idle. The daemon stays at about 15 MB.
Switching
Keep your commands. Change the engine.
Install Kiri
On a Mac, the app. On Windows, a per-user installer for WSL2. On Linux, a
.debor.rpm:curl -fsSL https://runkiri.com/install.sh | bash.Bring your things over
Kiri moves images, volumes and containers over from Docker Desktop or OrbStack, so nothing is rebuilt. Keep the old one installed while you try it.
Run what you always run
$ docker compose upKiri adds a
kiridocker context, so thedockerCLI, Compose, buildx and your IDE talk to Kiri.
Questions
Asked often.
What is the best Docker Desktop alternative?
It depends on what you need, so we publish the numbers. On one Mac with the same 2 CPUs and 8 GB, Kiri started a container in 22 ms, Colima in 152 ms, Docker Desktop in 178 ms and OrbStack in 279 ms. Kiri is also the only one of the four that is free at work, open source and runs on Mac, Windows and Linux.
Is Kiri a drop-in replacement for Docker Desktop?
For the Docker side, yes: Kiri serves the Docker Engine API, so the docker CLI, Docker Compose, buildx and tools that use the Docker socket work unchanged. Kiri brings its own docker CLI, Compose and buildx, or leaves yours alone with Kiri Lite.
Is Kiri free for commercial use?
Yes. Kiri is free for personal and commercial use at any company size, and its code is open source under the Apache 2.0 licence.
Can I keep Docker Desktop installed?
Yes. Kiri uses its own socket and its own docker context called kiri, and doesn't take over as the default engine while Docker Desktop is there. It can also import your images, volumes and containers.
Does Kiri run on Windows?
Yes, inside WSL2 with a native Windows window. On one Windows PC Kiri started a container in 78 ms against Docker Desktop's 491 ms.
Read next